Pedagogia do Jogo: O processo organizacional dos Jogos Esportivos Coletivos enquanto modelo metodológico para o ensino
Resumo
A pedagogia do jogo parte do princípio que todo os jogos esportivos coletivos (JECs) são antes de tudo Jogo, e que mantêm um padrão de estruturas que interagem entre si, en - gendrando emergências, intensificando emoções, evidenciando, assim, suas caracterís - ticas imanentes e irredutíveis. Assim, só podem ser compreendidos à luz do emergente paradigma ecológico, alicerçando-se na teoria sistêmica e no pensamento complexo. Com esta base teórica podemos compreender o processo organizacional sistêmico da família dos JECs, descrevendo seu princípio organizador, em meio à construção de um modelo metodológico para o ensino/treinamento de jogadores, da iniciação ao alto ren - dimento, que permita o desenvolvimento de ativos (valores), junto às competências es - sências, ao longo da vida.
REFERENCES
1. Australian Sports Commission (1997). Game Sense – Developing Thinking Players, Belconnen, ASC.
2. Brown T (2013) A vision lost? (Re)articulating an Arnoldian conception of education ‘in’ movement in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 21-37.
3. Bunker D, Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1): 5–8.
4. Goodyear V, Casey A, Kirk D (2016). Practice architectures and sustainable curriculum renewal. Journal of Curriculum Studies. DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1149223
5. Kirk D (1983). A New Term for a Vacant Peg: Conceptualising Physical Performance in Sport. Bulletin of Physical Education, 19 (3), pp. 38-44.
6. Kirk D (1998). Schooling Bodies: School Practice and Public Discourse 1880-1950. London: Leicester University Press.
7. Kirk D (2010). Physical Education Futures London: Routledge.
8. Kirk D, Macdonald D (2001) Teacher Voice and Ownership of Curriculum Change. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 33(5), 551-567.
9. Kirk D, Brooker R, Braiuka S (2000) Teaching Games for Understanding: A Situated Perspective on Student
Learning. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
10. Memert D, Harvey S (2008) The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Some Concerns and Solutions for Further Development. Journal
of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(2), 220-240.
11. Metzler MW (2005) Instructional Models for Physical Education. Holcomb Hathaway Publications. 12. Munrow AD (1963) Pure and Applied Gymnastics. London: Arnold
13. Renshaw I, Araujo D, Button C, Chow JY, Davids K, Moy B (2016) Why the Constraints-Led Approach is not Teaching Games for Understanding: a clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 459-480.
14. Stolz S, Pill S (2014) Teaching games and sport for understanding: Exploring and reconsidering its relevance in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 36-71.
